""Says open source advocate Chris Messina in a recent blog post on CC OpenID:"Creative Commons is redistributing the brand equity and social capital their members have accrued over the last several years by letting people show and verify their affiliation to the organization.With this simple example, we can start to see the symbiosis of making an intentional choice about identity: Creative Commons finds a new revenue opportunity and members of the community have a way to express their affiliation and promote the brand."
Friday, August 07, 2009
cc open id
via bq:
heather liggett on npr
Here's Ms. H. Liggett's twitter page. NPR's M. Brand (?) interviewed her on Fri. afternoon. Go take a look for yrself at her activism-type work:
http://twitter.com/hal512
http://twitter.com/hal512
Some good old libertarianista type ideas there, but not often fully formed... I wouldn't trade a corporate oligarchy for a collectivist-leaning republic, I don't think... but maybe some "libertarians" would. What would Ron Paul do?
use yr infoskillz
Here you go, see if you can find problems with Maddow's logic here:
Maybe you can't. But who else is going to try? And who the frak else is dissecting the layers of oligarchy at recessrally.com?
Maybe you can't. But who else is going to try? And who the frak else is dissecting the layers of oligarchy at recessrally.com?
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
buildingthree blogspot wearable web
http://buildingthree.blogspot.com/2009/07/wearable-web-3-4.html:
Libraries as repositories for gestural web choreography?
Librarians as break dancing cardboard kings, pulling up the ghostest in the machine with the mostest?
Library programs on new paralanguage affectations based on efforts to disguise covert face-to-face real-time tagging of your interlocutor?
Wild stuff on its way.
--
re: haraway more:
http://criticalanimal.blogspot.com/2009/06/biopolitics-of-michael-pollan-and-donna.html
http://bumblejim.blogspot.com/2009/06/21st-century-relationships-did-donna.html
http://dprpatterson.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-1985-donna-haraways-now-famous-essay.html
http://rantnrave-88.livejournal.com/6460.html
http://www.iqdupont.com/blog/2009/7/12/communication-control-haraways-investigation-of-the-shift-fr.html
http://yasminlist.blogspot.com/2009/07/re-yasmindiscussions-r-re-ethnic-cyborg.html
Following on from last post's comment on gendering of the Web... it occurs to me that the Web won't be or can't be successfully gendered by in the way I suggested. Just because feminine terms out-rank masculine terms, etc. Bibliometric brute force won't make the Web pink nor blue. Many reasons for this (maybe more on the subject later), but the main idea is that since we can't 'gender' the Web, it remains for the Web to increasingly disrupt basic identity categories of us... that is, the tabs that we use to build up identity (gender, race or ethnicity, languages, others) will be subverted and (forgive the term) fractalized by the Web's presence in/on our bodies. There's something important here about the body really becoming a proving ground now for Haraway's feminist cyborgs, but I haven't thought it through yet...
Libraries as repositories for gestural web choreography?
Librarians as break dancing cardboard kings, pulling up the ghostest in the machine with the mostest?
Library programs on new paralanguage affectations based on efforts to disguise covert face-to-face real-time tagging of your interlocutor?
Wild stuff on its way.
--
re: haraway more:
http://criticalanimal.blogspot.com/2009/06/biopolitics-of-michael-pollan-and-donna.html
http://bumblejim.blogspot.com/2009/06/21st-century-relationships-did-donna.html
http://dprpatterson.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-1985-donna-haraways-now-famous-essay.html
http://rantnrave-88.livejournal.com/6460.html
http://www.iqdupont.com/blog/2009/7/12/communication-control-haraways-investigation-of-the-shift-fr.html
http://yasminlist.blogspot.com/2009/07/re-yasmindiscussions-r-re-ethnic-cyborg.html
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
google os based on chrome
NY Times has (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/technology/companies/08operate.html):
SAN FRANCISCO — In a direct challenge to Microsoft, Google announced late Tuesday that it is developing an operating system for PCs that is tied to its Chrome Web browser.
The software, called the GoogleChrome Operating System, is initially intended for use in the tiny, low-cost portable computers known as netbooks, which have been selling quickly even as demand for other PCs has plummeted. Google said it believed the software would also be able to power full-size PCs.
Which is cool on a number of fronts -- Being an open source system (?) it'll further the general 'biodiversity' of the web as it invites modifications. It'll knock MS hard which is good for all of our imaginations (I'm tired of walking around in a Windows frame of mind, forced to crunch my numbers and words in Windows ways).
But the mainmost possibility here is that a Google OS will really be better for organizing the world's information than a MS OS or a Mac OS is. That could be good for librarians and patrons and knowledge workers etc. etc. depending on the particulars of how it falls out. Somehow that an easier integrated e-book search tool for example might become as workaday and common as the Microsoft Paint application -- this is the kind of shift we might be looking at. Operating systems are powerful cultural devices. They really do start working as metaphors, and if you spend lots of time with a program (hours per day at work for example) you can start thinking in ways that enables you to get along better in the OS (Jaron Lanier's idea orginally I think? [http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.12/lanier_pr.html]).
So, if nothing else, a new OS is good for the cultural imagination simply because it's something new and different for your head to stare at for 60+ hours per week.
We'll see.
--
Also: Google's OS is mainly for netbooks, at least at first (?). Wired news --
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/five-things-googles-chrome-os-will-do-for-your-netbook/
&
http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/07/google-announces-pc-operating-system-to-compete-with-windows/
Thursday, June 25, 2009
hunch, @ we blog
hunch
New work up at Information Today’s Newsbreaks.
“Hunch: Psycho-Social Divinatory Machine for the Masses”
(Thanks @ Chris Dixon for the dialog!)
Monday, June 01, 2009
qik & sousveillance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sousveillance
Sousveillance is about us all 'at the bottom' observing what goes on around and above us in an intentional way. Missteps by those in power (censorship, abuse, illegal moves of other kinds) can be recorded and cataloged just as well as the illegal moves of those 'below' -- us -- can be recorded and cataloged by those in power.
Qik may be a tool that takes sousveillance where it really needs to go -- live feed. It's got some kind of Facebook app too that I haven't explored yet. Camera phones can be confiscated -- but if the video is streaming live, then you can imagine that security may become reticent even to take said phone away, as long as doing so is an illegal act (or an embarrassment for the org or polis they may represent).
This could hold feet to fire. This could be a real tool for The People to document grievances against their states. "Equiveillance" is the term, I think.
They're watching, and we're watching too.
Friday, May 22, 2009
addictomatic re:
For my money, Addictomatic is still a great way to grok the 'tone of the web' on newsy subjects.
Listening: "Rejoice" U2, October
Reading: 'library ala carte' faqs
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
new work by Reverend Doctor Hegwood
Jared Hegwood has new pieces out this year -- go read them:
“Like Fish” here at elimae
“Hugs” here at Keyhole Magazine
“Lately” forthcoming at Night Train
Sunday, April 26, 2009
disinformation on education
If Mr Gatto is right, are librarians who really do equitably and on principle defend free access to any information for the common good systemically at odds with the system? Are librarians acceptable enemies of the corporate state structure (that is, are we enemies that are necessary & have to be tolerated)? What gives?
(Via disinfo.com...)
Saturday, April 25, 2009
disaster pandemic aid notes
Bill Gates on mosquitos, Vinay Gupta on ending poverty with open hardware.
--
--
And now we have the Swine Flu in North America.
Disaster relief, open design solutions, local control, growing food from your own garden, solar water distillation and solar UV purification... all sounds a little more suburan in light of these worries:
...
C> Understand what pandemic flu is and is not. Do some reading, not just the news, but the “flubie” sites - there are a number. You’ll see opinions from “end of civilization” through to “keep calm and carry on.” Prediction is difficult, especially of the future, but understanding the range of options and contingencies is critical at this time. You are an individual and community actor in a situation which is as threatening to your life as a car crash or an aeroplan crash in many ways. The fact that the threat is large and distant does not change that it is real. Your brain is poorly evolved to act rationally around large, remote threats but you can compensate by reading, thinking and acting.
D> Go out, today, and buy four things. Surgical or N95 masks, hand sanitizer, a gallon of bleach, and a week’s worth of groceries. You need these things not just to protect you, but to protect the people around you if you get sick. The surgical mask stops you breathing in infectious particles, but it’s even more effective at stopping you infecting other people. Hand sanitizer should be used immediately on returning home or arriving at the office: if everybody does this is really helps protect these spaces. Bleach is a contingency measure in case of things like water supply problems or a need to disinfect an area. The groceries trip is practice for social distancing by reducing your number of trips out, and gives you a little buffer. Social distancing is about avoiding unnecessary contact with crowds and public places to reduce infection risks. If you are in an area at risk, make one trip, not five. Pretty soon everywhere may be at risk at least some of the time.
All of these measures have two effects. The first is that they protect you. The second is that by protecting you, they protect the people around you, and if enough of us do these things, we all protect each other.
Right now, London has no reported cases. If you are reading this in Mexico, however, you should implement immediately. And if cases show up in London, we are on a war footing immediately: everybody does these things to protect everybody else, period.
Friday, April 24, 2009
building library 3.0
UPDATE:
Amazon's US page for my book is:
---
Here, I'll summarize the book. Libraries gotta get with supporting niche groups & 'communities of interest' with 2.0 tools now so that when Semantic (web 3.0) applications start spilling out and wowing our public, we stand ready as trustworthy midwives to help them manage and evaluate more information than they've ever had to deal with before. Hope my pubisher don't mind me doing that (sorry Dr. J for spilling the beans!), but that's what it's about. Maybe you'll still see fit to buy a copy.
I interview such luminaries as Jessamyn West, Lori Bell, Bruce Sterling... other good stuff from other good folks too. Todd Humble talks RFID. Ramona Holmes talks Metadata.
It should be out by June, maybe even late May, but it's already peeping at:
It's the best statement I could have made about these issues at the time I was writing it, and I can't say it any better now than I could have some months ago.
Hope you'll find something valuable there.
This thing is a sort of love letter to libraries, but I think now it's also a kind of manifesto.
We've got A LOT OF work TO DO. As usual. It's the future again. Look for it soon.
Thursday, April 23, 2009
notes / links
Just some things I want to keep up with..
godin's bald head
ted talks
flash drives
CMS in the abstract
airplane emergency landing theatre
serendipity purposed
chaos & magic
info-economics.
but the whole thing with the power of Golden Arches
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
infosthetics messing me up
like I know he can.
now I'm thinking abt customizability (why not infinite?) and control. And how control is pyschosis. Why not infinite psychoses for an Augmented Reality or VR world? Huh?
Do we have psycho sprouts jumping up now in the seedbeds of MySpace?
blech.
lib inst cms's
Thinking about instructional CMS... Libguides looks might smooth, very nice. Austin Community College seems to know how to use the tools. But is the brand worth the money?
Now looking at Library a la Carte from Oregon State...
Seems to get the same job done. Free & free, too.
But I'll keep reading and looking at yr CMS ventures, looking for gaps, failings, and wonderful things. We're starting to wake up after 13 years now, and so we be late somewhat to the libguides action and other things. I hold out hope that we may still woo our peeps even coming so late to the dancefloor like.
The Thing seems to be to me right now that I need to talk about the web with the web. I need to talk about web tools (and even our dustybooks are found with a webtool) with web tools. McLuhan and wot-wot: it's not just steam and bluster. The medium, the medium. If I keep talking websearch technique with paper and ink my audience will pick up, rightly, on the mental disconnect at work that keeps me from really groking the tool I demo.
It is time to get a little further out in the pond (all this is in ref to instruction, btw), and show folks how to swim, float, paddle, play, move, traverse, in the... uh... water. While in the water.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
judith krug, thankee sai
http://www.ala.org/ala/newspresscenter/news/pressreleases2009/april2009/oifkrug.cfm
--
...
Woody Evans
http://woodyevans.com/
Writing & Research for Hire
CHICAGO –Judith Fingeret Krug, 69, the long-time director of the American Library Association's (ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) and executive director of the Freedom to Read Foundation, who fought censorship on behalf of the nation's libraries, died April 11 after a lengthy illness.
Krug, who often said, "Censorship dies in the light of day," was the director of OIF and executive director of the Freedom to Read Foundation for more than 40 years. She was admired and respected for her efforts to guarantee the rights of individuals to express ideas and read the ideas of others without governmental interference...
--
...
Woody Evans
http://woodyevans.com/
Writing & Research for Hire
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Cell phones are not annoying in and of themselves, it is the abuse of cell phones that should be outlawed.
Unfortunately most people are too inconsiderate simply by nature to understand that a loud annoying ringtone or cell yell irritates everyone in their vicinity. They ruin it for everyone.
Until basic manners catch up with technology an outright cell phone ban is the only solution.
that's a buncha bull.
either you embrace the gizmos or yr patrons find elsewhere to be, man.
the gizmos are here to stay. yr library may not be.
and if it's human rudeness yr trying to change, hey, you'll be trying for a real, real long time.
good luck.
WE